| Home |
| History |
| Philosophy |
| Locations |
| Contacts |
| News |
| Available Positions |
| Corporate Wheel |
| LTC medical supplies |
| Calendar of Events |
| Nursing Care FAQ |
| MDS Tips |
| Regulatory Links |
| Informational Links |
| Other Misc. Links |
| Consumer Information |
| How Safe Is Our Food? |
|
|
|
| Thursday, 26 April 2007 | |
|
Every year, an estimated 76 million Americans become sick from foodborne illnesses. Some 300,000 are hospitalized, and 5,000 die after consuming foods tainted with bad bacteria, viruses or parasites. After years of declining budgets, calls for food safety reform haven taken on new urgency within both the executive branch and the Congress. The proposed 2008 budgets proposed increased funding for the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service and additional funds for the FDA to better track, detect and respond to outbreaks of foodborne illness, such as the recent warning from the FDA that consumers not eat certain jars of Peter Pan peanut butter or Great Value peanut butter due to risk of contamination with Salmonella Tennessee (a bacterium that causes foodborne illness). After the high-profile spinach saga in 2006, Congressional hearings were held in to review the roles of federal regulatory agencies involved in the oversight of food safety, and the adequacy of their communications with the public. There are currently two oversight systems: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) oversees meat, poultry and processed egg products, while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates everything else we eat, including produce, seafood and shelled eggs. Critics point to other serious problems that need to be remedied: Guidelines for fresh produce are voluntary without any teeth for enforcement. Although food imports have doubled over the past decade, the FDA’s staff and budget allocated for food safety have been slashed in recent years and the number of inspectors has decreased. The FDA and USDA instituted Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) food safety guidelines in recent years to promote continuous monitoring of critical control points in the process of food manufacturing The plans are mandatory for the processing of seafood, juice, meat and poultry. HACCP is viewed as a more systematic and efficient alternative to government spot inspections of processing plants and food products. The long-term care industry is not required to follow the HACCP guidelines in the preparation and service of foods, but very stringent sanitation guidelines are followed as part of the current Food Code. These include ensuring that foods come from approved sources, maintaining appropriate temperatures during receiving, handling, preparation, service and storage, as well as policies and procedures related to safe food handling by all employees. How You Can Stay Safe at Home
For a complete prevention list, and to find out how safe your kitchen is, use our online resource guide:
Submitted By: Alicia Aguiar |
|
| Last Updated ( Monday, 28 April 2008 ) |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|